Teaching · student supervision · consultations

Good teaching does more than provide answers. It teaches students to ask the right questions.

My teaching connects information systems, cybersecurity and HCI with critical and methodologically sound thinking about digital technologies.

Subject areas
Information systems · security · HCI
Student supervision
Bachelor’s · Master’s · doctoral theses
Study support
Consultations · methodological guidance · Moodle

Teaching approach

From knowledge to professional judgement

Students should not merely know the terminology. They should understand relationships, choose an appropriate method and justify their decisions.

I place theory in specific situations that require students to identify a problem, distinguish relevant information and consider the consequences of different solutions. Technology is not an end in itself, but part of a human and organisational environment.

I emphasise careful work with sources, data and methods. Conclusions must reflect the strength of the available evidence; persuasive language cannot replace a transparent process or critical interpretation.

In supervision, I aim to provide clear feedback and a direction for the next stage. Responsibility for consistent progress, academic decisions and the final work nevertheless remains with the student.

Subject areas

Three interconnected fields

My teaching links the operation of digital systems with their security, usability and real impact on users and organisations.

Information Systems

Information systems

The role of information systems in organisations, including their quality, value, governance and evaluation in practice.

Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity

Security as both a technical and behavioural problem involving risk, user decisions, responsibility and proportionate protection.

Human–Computer Interaction

Usability and HCI

The relationship between people and systems, interface clarity, user experience and the usability of digital services.

Standard of academic work

What I expect from students

The goal is not perfection or an impressive-looking result. What matters is consistent, independent and academically defensible work.

01 · INDEPENDENCE

Take responsibility

Work consistently, prepare specific questions and actively decide how to proceed.

02 · METHOD

Choose an appropriate approach

Connect the research question, sources, data and analysis in a way that is transparent and reproducible.

03 · EVIDENCE

Distinguish claims from findings

Ground conclusions in the available evidence and avoid assigning results more significance than they can support.

04 · CRITIQUE

Acknowledge limitations

Challenge your assumptions, consider alternative explanations and discuss the limitations of the work openly.

Thesis supervision

Expectations at each level of study

As the level of study advances, expectations increase in terms of methodological depth, originality, independence and the ability to place findings in a wider academic context.

01 · BACHELOR’S

A clear problem and an appropriate practical component

I expect a basic academic review, a clear objective, an approach suited to the assignment and a factual explanation of the results.

Focus problem definition · literature review · practical output
02 · MASTER’S

Deeper analysis and a defensible contribution

The emphasis is on a well-considered method, critical data analysis, discussion of alternatives and limitations, and a clear contribution from the proposed or evaluated solution.

Focus method · analysis · interpretation · contribution
03 · DOCTORAL

An independent, sustained research programme

Doctoral study requires an original research question, methodological precision, systematic publication activity and the ability to develop an academic argument independently.

Focus originality · research programme · publications · independence

Topics for students

A specific problem, not just a broad field

I favour realistically scoped topics at the intersection of informatics, security, usability and systems evaluation. An initial proposal should identify the problem, a possible objective and the intended output.

  • security behaviour and user decision-making,
  • information systems and digital service evaluation,
  • usability, HCI and risk communication,
  • cybersecurity in public administration,
  • responsible AI in expert systems.

Study organisation

Consultations and Moodle

Study materials and organisational information are available through the University’s Moodle environment. Consultations address specific academic and methodological questions; they do not replace consistent independent work.

Moodle consultations methodology feedback thesis supervision

Contact for students

Do you have a topic proposal or a specific question?

If you are interested in thesis supervision, please send me a brief problem statement, a preliminary objective and an idea of the possible approach. A broad subject area alone is usually insufficient to assess whether a topic is suitable.